Titelpagina voor Fasti magistratuum et triumphorvum Romanorum, 1566

Curator: Looking at this engraving, made in 1566 by Hubert Goltzius, the first impression I have is of profound density. The composition feels intensely packed. What do you make of it? Editor: The sheer number of figures represented tells me of a deeply patriarchal society that relentlessly memorialized political events. Note the dedication – a declaration of accomplishments made in honor of Rome and its triumph, but I immediately question who gets remembered and how their narrative dominates. Curator: See how the engraving employs stark contrasts and intricate line work to differentiate the foreground from the background. Goltzius has skillfully articulated the muscularity of the figures and texture of the aged paper, achieving depth through strategic arrangements of lines. Editor: Precisely, but within these careful lines lies a deliberate construction of power, a white-washing of history if you will. Observe the three allegorical figures dominating the top register, these are clearly representations of power and likely serve to further endorse Rome’s political elite, their stories perpetually retold through generations. Curator: You're prompting a shift in focus from just the image to its historical function. In that spirit, note that "Fasti magistratuum et triumphorum Romanorum," is a visual index or catalogue. I think that as a print, the materiality enables it to function beyond unique aesthetic object – this has dissemination, function and portability. Editor: True, its purpose seems straightforward—an archival project aiming to restore the greatness of ancient Rome by registering its rulers. However, the “restoration” rings hollow to me because this archive further silences many while elevating the stories of a few. The deliberate composition perpetuates a hegemonic vision and contributes to its overall power. Curator: That perspective grants greater critical insight. I will now forever consider the engraving through a much wider lens of inclusion. Editor: It's been rewarding to expose layers beneath Goltzius' intricate linework that speak to socio-political questions related to agency and erasure.