Optocht van de rederijkerskamer van Haarlem bij de herdenking van het beleg van Haarlem, ca. 1660 by Pieter van Looy

Optocht van de rederijkerskamer van Haarlem bij de herdenking van het beleg van Haarlem, ca. 1660 1879

0:00
0:00
pietervanlooy's Profile Picture

pietervanlooy

Rijksmuseum

drawing, print, etching, ink

# 

drawing

# 

narrative-art

# 

dutch-golden-age

# 

print

# 

etching

# 

ink

# 

group-portraits

# 

history-painting

Dimensions: height 213 mm, width 505 mm

Copyright: Rijks Museum: Open Domain

Editor: This is "Optocht van de rederijkerskamer van Haarlem bij de herdenking van het beleg van Haarlem, ca. 1660," an etching and ink drawing by Pieter van Looy from 1879, located at the Rijksmuseum. It seems to depict a historical procession. What can you tell me about the significance of this particular representation of the event? Curator: Well, looking at Van Looy’s drawing, it’s essential to consider the material conditions of its production and the social context in which it was made. Etchings and ink drawings allowed for reproduction and dissemination. Given that the piece dates to 1879, decades after the supposed event in 1660, we should be considering why *this* way of representing it, *using these* readily available materials, mattered to the artist, the commissioner, and to its audience. What narrative are they trying to construct, and how does the choice of medium influence the reception? Editor: That's interesting. So, it's not just about what's depicted, but *how* it was made and how that contributes to its meaning. Curator: Precisely! The medium itself, etching and ink on paper, allowed for a controlled narrative accessible to a broad public, linking ideas of cultural memory and nationhood in this period, since it comes after the actual siege of Haarlem. Consider also how this medium lends itself to both precise detail, signifying ‘truth,’ but is also a designed image with labor behind it. What does the tension of reproducible versus handcrafted create here? Editor: I never thought about the material production in that light. The labor and distribution definitely changes things! Curator: Indeed. These details aren’t just neutral; they actively shape our understanding of the history being presented. Editor: Thank you. This has really changed how I’ll look at drawings in the future. Focusing on the "how" and "why" it was made is going to add a lot more depth for me. Curator: Exactly! And recognizing art not just as images but products embedded within systems of power and making.

Show more

Comments

No comments

Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.